Is the Noble Peace Prize Committee becoming a political action group, working to prop-up politicians in order to serve their will, and their version of peace in the world? Is peace at any cost worthy? What about Iran's sponsoring of proxy terrorist organizations like Hezbollah, and Hamas, and what about their movement of Iranian Republican Guard into Afghanistan with weapons and their assistance or their hand in assisting insurgents in Iraq to kill US and NATO troops? What about the on-going human rights issues when it comes to women in the Islamic World? Surely, a judge on the Noble Peace Prize Committee understands that there is no peace for those who live under such horrible conditions and/or are continually denied basic human rights.
The other day, David Letterman got slammed for his sexual forays at work (which apparently went on for over a decade), but one has to ask if it is because of his change of heart in poking fun at Obama, that all this came out in the media? Of course, anyone in the late-night TV business realizes that once a major politician is below 50% in the polls, it's free-game.
Now then, did the Nobel Peace Prize Committee choose to give President Obama the Nobel Peace Prize to prevent his popularity and poll numbers from slipping any further? After all, if his poll numbers slip any further, he will become an ineffectual president, and he will no longer be able to serve the will of the European Union.
This is not a conspiracy theory.
It's merely an observation of how those in the EU are acting towards our young and naive president, a president who they'd like to control to serve their will, which most of the time is counter to what is best for America.
Therefore, I for one do not trust the Noble Peace Prize Committee any longer, or that organization at all.
They should be ignored, as they are nothing to aspire to, they've shown their true colors.
Please consider all this.