This treatise describes how the one-God religion evolved from its Hebrew prototype into the present pseudonym dominated religion market: via Judaism perversion from the original children of Israel namesake, into a multitude of unsanctioned denominations, and into Islam via a clever arrogation.
Modernly, Jew is a misnomer, losing distinction through the new name mandated by Messianic imperatives in Ezekiel 37:22.
Such distinction was realized under messianic kingdom auspices.
Christianity was a chosen people inheritance via Daniel 7:27 but confined to a small group and time frame; therefore, we must criticize any discipline claiming benefit past the one event mandating fulfillment.
Temple destruction in early August A.
D.
70 announced the scattering of power to announce the end thus proposed.
Despite Temple ruins, modern Christian and Jew continue as if still lived in first century ambience; yet, they condemn each other's monotheism with prejudice; Muslims castigate the other two as unbelievers.
Each plots the others' demise, unaware of extinct sanctions, and exposed in their own small ambition.
Each earns a mere 33.
3% legitimacy chance.
Percentages can be reduced even further.
Here we consider three reasons why the three monotheisms inhere no legality.
1.
) Uppermost, Muslims show least understanding of the monotheism incentive.
They perceive Islam as a Jehovah (Allah) theism via a clearly disinherited Ishmael attribute: claimed as progenitor of Mohammed's more recent ancestry; thus, they ignore the seed line restriction to inheritance through Abraham's promise to Isaac only of his eight sons.
Any person not of Abraham descent, through Isaac and Isaac's son Jacob, fails the promise decree.
Muslims consider the Bible inspired but ignore the application limit; at the same time, they plagiarize the Jacob (Israel) esoteric, denied to all but Israel progeny.
Islam zealots ignore this rare tidbit; however, Ishmael's disinherited status creates legitimacy problems -- in the end-time or at any time.
2.
) All three religions honor Daniel and Gabriel yet neglect the Ten Ages time frame; its timeliness is cleverly hidden in Daniel and eminent in the first century Revelation pointing to the 'last age'; which 'Ten Ages' limit prohibits any God-Covenant extension past Temple destruction, as elucidated in the Sadducean example (Matt.
22:30, a parable prohibiting God-Israel union past the end).
Prophecy is unfriendly to post-Temple adaptations, occurring as opposing and multilateral extensions: Christian arrogation, Jewish existentialism, or Islam sectarianism! 3.
) Islam accuses Judaism and Christian of infidelity; the latter think themselves superior and qualified heirs to the biblical promise.
Such imputes language problems and adapting changes wrought from legal-historical immutability.
All three ignore the A.
D.
first century address: to 'this generation and to 'end times' set in Olivet simplicity.
Without legitimate God sanctions, time, or beneficence, billions of beguiled monotheists live a troubled pursuit.
Set in Daniel, the Ten Covenant Dispensations incur special time frame and disagree with modern religion timetables.
Bible prophecy and New Testament eminence thereof combines to magnify the interpretation quality of modern religions.
The why of it all is available to those with interest.