Sometimes parents dealing with the juvenile legal structure feel as if they are slipping deeper and deeper into quicksand.
I understand how you feel! This short article is about giving you a criminal defense law firm's take.
Probably the most significant cause of annoyance for parents and juvenile defense lawyers alike is the special rehabilitative part played by the State (and by State I am incorporating the prosecuting lawyers in addition to the probation officials) any time this comes into conflict with your juvenile's lawful rights.
The State frequently isn't as concerned as they should be concerning the legal rights of your child - and experience tells me that they typically bypass the actual specifics associated with the case and progress to the punishment or "rehabilitative" step of the case too quickly.
Not just that, but occasionally it kind of feels like the evaluator walks away with a somewhat different take on a talk with a parent or guardian.
I do not pretend to understand exactly why, although it's certainly not unusual for the mother and father to notify someone assessing their child or teen something similar to, "He's a good kid and he helps others...
at times he doesn't listen to me and that can be annoying, however he has been doing better lately...
" And what makes it in the review that's submitted to the district attorney or the Judge is, "Guardian claims the child does not pay attention to them and the guardian is aggravated with the juvenile...
" I feel strongly that your juvenile ought to have a voice as well.
Maybe your teen did not do anything wrong at all.
Maybe they made a bad mistake or perhaps hurt another person.
Regardless, isn't one of the most unfortunate experiences your teenager can take from interacting with the justice process is that authority figures are allowed to make-up the guidelines as they go along? How determined will an adolescent end up being to do better when they believe authority figures will still treat them unfairly even when they do their best?