Is there a correlation between emotion, gravity and cancer and if so, what? First we need to understand gravity and what causes it. Of course we know that when we jump up gravity brings us down to Earth. We also know that climbing a hill is much harder than coming down. That's simple enough. Gravity is a force that changes the motion of a body in space - just as Newton explained. His 'General Relativity' provided a framework suggesting that everybody experiences the same physics laws in each moment, regardless of their movement in space. Then gravity became seen as a general universal property, not a force pertaining to separate bodies in space. Relativity posited that gravity, encompassed the four dimensions of space and time, as a geometrical structure.

However, herein was a problem. All the other natural forces had apparent opposites. For example electromagnetic forces have attraction and repulsion. So how could gravity be different? We had to wait for 'Quantum Field Theory' to get an answer. Dr Frank Wilczek of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, explained that 'Gravitons' which were supposed to generate gravity, them having no negative charge, actually responded to positive energy density.

But are we assuming too much here? Is gravity really only an attractive force? Going back to our jumping exercise let's look at what forces are involved to get us a few inches off the ground. Our muscles, which weigh mere kilograms, overcome all 6 x 1024 kilograms of our planet's gravitational pull. So gravity is really quite a puny force - 1040 times weaker than the electromagnetic force holding atoms together. We should be thankful for this because if gravity was much stronger we would all be rooted to the spot. Theory has it that at the moment of universal birth both matter and expanding space time were brought into being. Universal expansion, from the alleged big bang, caused particles of matter to drift apart, weakening their mutual attraction. it seems that there is a very precarious relationship between gravity and universal expansion. If expansion became too widespread star nurseries wouldn't be able to form. However, stronger gravity would create stronger stars but they would quickly collapse in on themselves.

Charles Darwin showed that gravity sensors in plants gave them a sense of up and down. Plants in pots, when turned on their side, still produce roots that grow towards the centre of the Earth. The roots of plants grown in space tend to become disoriented and ineffective be able to access nutrients and water.

Yet, according to gravity mass theory (gravity = mass times distance) there is zero attraction at the centre of the earth, or any spheroid, Equal mass in all directions creates central weightlessness, according to this theory. Zero attraction at the centre of a sphere stops the sphere from collapsing in on itself. But how can the planet's mass be drawn to the Earth's centre when there is zero attraction? Something else must be going on. There has to be some repulsive force to balance gravity to stop mass imploding? The most likely answer is that it has to do with the properties of electromagnetism.

But it could not just be about electromagnetism's push and pull effect because that would cancel out gravity, which is a very real force, albeit a weak one. Science came to the conclusion that this expansion was caused by a QME (quantum mechanical effect). The Pauli principle posits that two electrons with identical spin cannot occupy the same orbital state. When to atoms are attracted by gravity the QME prevents both electrons occupying the same space in time by some repulsive force that has come to be known as 'dark matter'. The distortion brought about by quantum mechanical wave function results in electromagnetic repulsion.

Although it is true that all physical phenomena observed in the early 21st century could be explained by quantum mechanics or general relativity, depending on scale, it does not tick all the boxes concerning attraction and repulsion. Quantum effects only accounted for matter no larger than molecules, whereas general relativity only took into consideration huge bodies in space. But there was no unified physics theory that showed a quantum and electromagnetic gravity effect at all scales. To find a unified physics theory that works we need to approach the phenomena from a different angle. Anaxagoras, a renowned ancient Greek scientist/philosopher posited the idea of 'Nous' (mind) being the creative force within atoms. General relativity applies to the quantum mechanics of atoms but not to the life force within. Only since quantum mechanics has been upgraded to quantum biology can we begin to see this. Certainly, our minds do have a huge effect on all aspects of our reality.

The physical effects of gravity have been studied for centuries but with very little consideration given to the metaphysical impact of gravity on our thinking, feelings, perceptions, intuitions, emotions etc. NASA, which prepares astronauts for life in space, does so by using zero-g flights. Hollowed out 727s continually nose dive from from 34 to 24 thousand feet so that trainee astronauts are gravity free for up to half a minute. During this experience astronauts have recorded that, apart from the physical effects, zero gravity had an affect on their thoughts and feelings. For example the as altitude increased it affected their attitude. They minds compelled them to keep one foot on the ground despite no gravitational force impeding them.

But we do not have to take a NASA flight to experience this. We can recreate this same experience anywhere by closing our eyes and letting go of our assumptions, perceptual biases, prejudices, preconditioned thoughts and judgments. By slowing down the inertia created by all the thoughts whirling through our minds we can feel that sense of stillness free of any gravitational pull. Whether we achieve this blissful state through meditation, relaxation, or unconditional love, is not important. The point here is that such a state is a manifestation of a unified physics theory that supersedes both general relativity and quantum mechanics.

Nik Allday, on his web page about gravity and emotions explains an analogy of warped space time and what we experience as gravity. He envisaged a large rubber sheet with heavy balls on it, representing planets, sitting where they form indentations in the sheet. A billiard ball was rolled on the sheet and it's trajectory was affected by the undulations in the rubber. With enough speed and distance from the planet its trajectory alters slightly as it passes. Too too close and it could spiral in ever decreasing circles to eventually come to a stop next to the planet.

This shows is that gravity is not comprised of particles or even a force field. it simply takes on the shape of the space time continuum. This warping and shaping of space time, Nik tells us, exists at all scales, from nano to colossal. Way down at the sub atomic level quantum biology creates effects, not mere existence. This is what Anaxagoras was trying to tell us. Quantum mechanics does not explain this but Quantum biology does. Therefore, the space time continuum has geometric shape determined by its content. As the bodies in space-time are based on fractal geometric logic, so is space-time. Only by space-time being based on fractal geometric logic can it be infinite and if it were not infinite we would run out of both.
Nik further posits that our experiences and reactions are all due to interactions in matter. All living systems are massively complex bodies, comprising atoms and molecules, that increase in complexity with evolution. Again this points to a universal fractal geometric dynamical design. Only such a logic can cope with such complexity in an ordered fashion. The interactive behaviour of living systems is based on the warped space time of their make up. This self-referencing attribute allows life to be and do at the same time. All living systems are an array of ordered particles zooming around their centres. oddly though, as, the spaces between atoms are huge, we, and all life forms, are mostly warped space time, with very little actual matter. taken to another level, Nik tells us that, from a fractal perspective thoughts become things and atoms create the structure of things. (matter). This being the case the 'Nous' would only pertain to space-time, not atomic structure. How can this be when 'Nous' is an innate creative physics force from the sub stratum of the atom?

If the whole of the universe is comprised of 'atoms of and in space' could there be some kind of gap in between any two such space-time atoms? If so could they exist devoid of space and time? Is a large part of the universe actually blank? Is this from where we get the dark matter? Is this dark matter pushing atoms apart accelerating and increasing expansion? Science understands that the spaces between atoms are huge relative to the size of the atoms. They can be likened to bodies in space. Yet these bodies themselves are not really solid things - just shapes in and formed by the happening of energy.

This is all very well at a physical level of existence but what about the metaphysical? Does it explain the psyche or our emotional experiences? For thousands of years we have developed our intellectual capacity to describe our world that helps us understand it and how it works. Nik points out that we are mostly unaware that the truth and significance of our logical discoveries is guided by our emotional, feeling and intuitive responses. So, as living systems, comprised of bits of matter in warped space-time, we are influenced and affected by emotional ripples that cause symmetrical and asymmetrical changes in the shape of our space time reality. Therefore the emotional content of our life is the manifestation of this complex warped space-time continuum. It is the interaction of these complex systems and the manifestation of the reality that we are. Our experience is merely the interplays of gravity. these interplays are predicated by what we are attracted to or repulsed by. Repulsion simply means being pushed away from. yet in our culture is seen as being ugly, hideous and generally disgusting. However, it seems increasingly likely that the psyche and our emotional experience is, as Nik points out, the complex shape and dynamics of space-time. In essence emotions are gravity.